|
Forthcoming Articles as of August 1, 2008
Indirect assessment of visual working memory for simple and complex objects
Tal Makovski & Yuhong V. Jiang
(T.M.) N218 Elliott Hall, 75 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455; tal.makovski@gmail.com
Click here to view manuscript.
The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information
Sean H. K. Kang, Kathleen B. McDermott, & Sophie M. Cohen
(S.H.K.K.) Department of Psychology, CB 1125, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130-4899; seankang@wustl.edu
Click here to view manuscript.
The multidetermined nature of idiom processing
Maya R. Libben & Debra A. Titone
(D.A.T.) Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Ave., Montreal, QC, H3A 1B1 Canada; dtitone@psych.mcgill.ca
The effects of generation on auditory implicit memory
Ilana T. Z. Dew & Neil W. Mulligan
(I.T.Z.D.) Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270; idew@unc.edu
Effects of grammar complexity on artificial grammar learning
Esther van den Bos & Fenna H. Poletiek
(E.B.) Cognitive Psychology, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9555, Leiden 2300 RB, The Netherlands; ejv28@cornell.edu
Different developmental patterns of simple deductive and probabilistic inferential reasoning
Henry Markovits & Valerie Thompson
(H.M.) Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, C. P. 8888, Succ Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3P8 Canada; Markovits.henry@uqam.ca
Is awareness necessary for true inference?
Peter D. Leo & Anthony J. Greene
(P.D.L.) University of Wisconsin, Department of Psychology, Garland Hall Rm 224, Milwaukee, WI 53211; pdleo@uwm.edu
Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind?
Daniel Casasanto
(D.C.) Department of Psychology, Jordan Hall, Bldg. 420, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; casasanto@alum.mit.edu
Click here to view manuscript.
Putting the psychology back into psychological models: Mechanistic versus rational approaches
Yasuaki Sakamoto, Matt Jones, Bradley C. Love
(Y.S.) Stevens Institute of Technology, Castle Point on the Hudson, Hoboken, NJ 07030; yasuaki.sakamoto@stevens.edu
Click here to view manuscript.
When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind
Jonathan Smallwood, Merrill McSpadden, & Jonathan W. Schooler
(J.S.) Psychology Department, Room F10, William Guild Hall, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland; j.smallwood@abdn.co.uk
Forgetting is effortful: Evidence from reaction time probes in an
item-method directed forgetting task
Jonathan M. Fawcett & Tracy L. Taylor
(J.M.F.) Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford Street, Halifax, NS B3H 4J1, Canada; jmfawcet@dal.ca
Recency and primacy in causal judgments: Effects of probe question and context switch on latent inhibition and extinction
Steven Glautier
(S.G.) School of Psychology, Southampton University, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England; spg@soton.ac.uk
Subtraction by addition
Jamie I. D. Campbell
(J.I.D.C.) Department of Psychology, 9 Campus Drive, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A5 Canada; jamie.campbell@usask.ca
Why are some people’s names easier to learn than others? The effects of face similarity on memory for face-name associations
Peter C. Pantelis, Marieke K. van Vugt, Robert Sekuler, Hugh R. Wilson, & Michael J. Kahana
(M.K.V.) Dept of Psychology, 3401 Walnut St, Rm 302C, Philadelphia, PA 19104; kahana@psych.upenn.edu
Cue usage in memory for location when orientation is fixed
Sylvia Fitting, Douglas H. Wedell, & Gary L. Allen
(S.F.) Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, 1512 Pendleton Street, Columbia, SC 29208; fitting@sc.edu
Opposing influences on conflict-driven adaptation in the Eriksen flanker task
Julie M. Bugg
(J.M.B.) Washington University, Department of Psychology, Campus Box 1125, One Brookings Dr., St. Louis, MO 63130; jbugg@artsci.wustl.edu
Global inhibition and midcourse corrections in speeded aiming
Erica L. Wohldmann, Alice F. Healy, & Lyle E. Bourne, Jr.
(E.L.W.) Department of Psychology, California State University, 18111 Nordhoff St., Northridge, CA 91330-8255; erica.wohldmann@csun.edu
A role for backward transitional probabilities in word segmentation?
Pierre Perruchet & Stéphane Desaulty
(P.P.) Université de Bourgogne, LEAD/CNRS, Pole AAFE, Esplanade Erasme, 21000 Dijon, France; pierre.perruchet@u-bourgogne.fr
Click here to view manuscript.
What is the impact of the explicit knowledge of sequence regularities on both deterministic and probabilistic serial reaction time task performance?
Nicholas Stefaniak, Sylvie Willems, Stéphane Adam, & Thierry Meulemans
(N.S.) Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of Liège, B33, Liège (Sart Tilman) B-4000, Belgium; nicolas.stefaniak@ulg.ac.be
Prior knowledge and exemplar frequency
Harlan D. Harris, Gregory L. Murphy, & Bob Rehder
(H.D.H.) Department of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10003; harlan.harris@nyu.edu
Click here to view manuscript.
Dominance and context effects on activation of alternative homophone meanings
Lillian Chen & Julie E. Boland
(L.C.) Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1043; lillianc@umich.edu
The picture superiority effect in associative recognition
William E. Hockley
(W.E.H.) Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3C5 Canada; whockley@wlu.ca
The contents of visual memory are only partly under volitional control
Ingrid R. Olson, Katherine Sledge Moore, & David B. Drowos
(I.R.O.) Department of Psychology, Weiss Hall, Temple University, 1701 North 13th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122-6085; iolson@temple.edu
RT distribution analysis of category congruence effects with masked primes
Sachiko Kinoshita & Louise Hunt
(S.K.) Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; sachiko@maccs.mq.edu.au
An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli
Paul S. Mattson & Lisa R. Fournier
(L.R.F.) Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4820; lfournier@wsu.edu
On the representation of task information in task switching: Evidence from task and dimension switching
André Vandierendonck, Evelien Christiaens, & Baptist Liefooghe
(A.V.) Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, Ghent 9000 , Belgium; andre.vandierendonck@ugent.be
Click here to view manuscript.
Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment
François Maquestiaux, Maude Laguë-Beauvais, Eric Ruthruff, & Louis Bherer
(F.M.) Department of Psychology, UFR STAPS de l’Université Paris-Sud, Orsay Cedex 91405, France; francois.maquestiaux@u-psud.fr
Training and transfer effects in task switching
Meredith Minear & Priti Shah
(M.M.) Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130; mereditheminear@gmail.com
Assessing a retrieval account of the generation and perceptual-interference effects
Neil W. Mulligan & Daniel Peterson
(N.W.M.) Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270; nmulligan@unc.edu
Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task
Julie M. Bugg, Larry L. Jacoby, & Jeffrey P. Toth
(J.M.B.) Department of Psychology, Washington University, Campus Box 1125, One Brookings Dr., St. Louis, MO 63130; jbugg@artsci.wustl.edu
Super Memory Bros: Going from mirror patterns to concordant patterns via similarity enhancements
Jason D. Ozubko & Steve Joordens
(J.D.O.) Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1 Canada; jdozubko@uwaterloo.ca
Self-centered memories: The reminiscence bump and the self
Clare J. Rathbone, Chris J. A. Moulin, & Martin A. Conway
(C.J.R.) Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, England; jhs1cjr@leeds.ac.uk
Perceptual representations in false recognition and priming of pictures
Yana Weinstein & David R. Shanks
(Y.W.) Department of Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, England; y.weinstein@ucl.ac.uk
Metacognition and part-set cuing: Can interference be predicted at retrieval?
Matthew G. Rhodes & Alan D. Castel
(M.G.R.) Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1876; matthew.rhodes@colostate.edu
Click here to view manuscript.
|
